Monday, December 28, 2020

President Trump Refuses To Acknowledge Election Results

 


President Donald Trump has made multiple accusations  of electoral fraud in the 2020 elections. There were irregularities due to a postal service under attack by the administration itself . Voter suppression and the possibility  of lost ballots demonstrate the American political structure was in decline before Trump was elected in 2016. What President Trump is seeking to do is to undo the election results through the courts. The lawsuits  have not been successful and the alarm about a "Trump coup" appears to be an exaggeration. The only way a Trump coup could happen is if the entire military and law enforcement apparatus was willing to prevent Biden from being sworn in. The Trump presidency is nearing its end, however the political transformation continues in America. Trumpism has not been defeated and could remain a possible threat to attempts for change. The Democratic Party has to perform at its highest level and adopt a more leftist agenda to thwart this movement. The real fear rather than a Trump coup, could be Trump attempting to run again in 2024. Expectations are high from the public and if certain demands are not met another a more dangerous extremist could get elected. Rumors continue to circulate that President Trump may not leave office, but this has not been confirmed. The transition of power will happen. The real challenge  is what happens afterwards.    

Wednesday, December 16, 2020

Mozambique Has Seen A Rise in Terrorist Activity

 


Mozambique has seen a gradual increase in terrorist activity. The group claims to be part of the Islamic State, but there has not been verification of this.  The intensity of fighting  has gotten so extreme Mozambique has requested the help of Tanzania and Zimbabwe. If the conflict gets larger it may have the SADC and African Union get involved. The rise of terrorist organizations in the southern African nation may not be entirely indigenous. Armed groups have been known to be backed multiple countries including Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates. The other possibility is that Mozambique just like other African nations could be slipping into civil war. President  Fillpe Nyusi  will meet with other leaders of the region to address security issues. Cabo Delgado province  appears to be in a state of full scale insurgency. Mozambique could be at risk of intervention from major world powers on the basis of restoring stability. There were rumors that  Al-Shabab was active in the country, but there has been little credible evidence to indicate any reach outside Somalia. Mozambique experienced a brutal civil war from 1977 to 1992, which was complicated by Cold War politics. FRELIMO and RENAMO maintained peace until the renewed insurgency in 2013. Terrorist  violence did not become apparent until 2015, which indicates that the root of this current conflict is from people coming into Mozambique. The country is an important regional center due to its economic importance. South Africa will get more involved in Mozambique's affairs for that reason.   

Friday, December 11, 2020

The Leaked Audio of Joseph Biden

 


An audio recording of Joseph Biden talking with notable civil rights figures was released. The controversy about the audio was his tone and general lack of solutions to critical problems. Biden stated that African Americans need to collaborate more with Hispanics. Following that he noted that the white population could be in the minority by 2040. The way Biden articulated that sounded more like some negative future event. There is a subtle racism that is present among Biden and certain factions of his supporters. The African American community has done more to protect the rights of various ethnic groups in America's history. Without the Immigration Act of 1965 or the Civil Rights Act of 1964 Asians and Latinos would not have the opportunities they have now. Biden's statements come off as condescending  to civil rights groups who actively fight to improve race relations. He went on to blame the position of defund the police  for  the failure of the Democratic Party to win elections. Law enforcement get more funding compared to public education and infrastructure projects. This demonstrates a general lack of understanding of how poor allocation of resources will create sociological problems. Biden refuses to acknowledge that it is not African Americans and Latinos causing disunity in the country; it is a white population that wants to maintain dominance. A Biden presidency will not be dedicated to economic empowerment, fighting racism, or general reform. This is an indication that unconventional participation will have to be used to get the change the American public desires.  

Thursday, December 3, 2020

The 2020 Tokyo Olympics Status

 


The Olympics were rescheduled   due to concerns related to COVID-19. Japan will be hosting the games in 2021. This will be the second time since 1964. The hope is that the pandemic will be either over or controlled by July 21 of 2021. If not, this could cause economic problems for Japan. Hosting the Olympics has been said to be good for a country's  growth. However, large scale investment in stadiums and venues is only temporary. Visitors will eventually leave, along with the financial support that tourism brings. The games have political significance as nations compete on  the world stage of sport. Many countries use the Olympics to deflect away from internal problems or to encourage nationalism in the public. Japan may not be able to do this with the dramatic changes coming from a post-Shinzo Abe era. The Olympics may not even provide unity among Asian nations. Anti-Chinese sentiment is growing globally, which has created tension among world powers. The 2020 Tokyo Olympics could be another extension of this rivalry. If the games to not happen in 2021, then they will be cancelled. So far, it appears Japan has COVID-19 under control to allow for the Olympics proceed as planned. 

Saturday, November 28, 2020

Ethiopia Wages War on The Tigrayan People's Liberation Front

 

Ethiopia has come to a point of ethnic conflict. The Ethiopian military has sought to wipe out the Tigrayan People's  Liberation Front, which could result in a long term civil war. The tension between Tigray, Amhara, and Oromo has grown in recent years. The Tigray have accused the government of marginalizing them since the death of Prime Minister Meles Zenawi. The conflict will spillover into neighboring countries, which could attract external interference. Prime Minister Abiy Amed's peace with Eritrea could be jeopardize depending on how the military operations on the TPLF go. Somalia remains a failed state, with terrorist organizations active there. Refugees  have fled into Sudan, a country attempting to adjust in a post-Omar al-Bashir political atmosphere. Ethiopia still has a dispute with Egypt over Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam project. The Nile River is a pivotal water source which Ethiopia, Sudan, and Egypt have an interest in. The African Union has not made any immediate plans for action or possible pressure to stop the violence. The biggest fear is that Ethiopia could be starting a process of balkanization, with new states emerging constantly at war with one another.  

Friday, November 13, 2020

Jerry Rawlings Condemns The ICC (2012)

 


Jerry Rawlings (1947-2020) has passed away. The fourth president of Ghana will be remembered for his revolutionary ideology. He was a controversial figure serving as both a military ruler and then elected civilian president of the country. After serving as president, Rawlings was active as an elder statesmen. Always vocal about foreign policy and the status quo set by the international community, he exposed the most obvious bias. Jerry Rawlings stated in 2012 the flaws of the International Criminal Court. The ICC has only targeted African leaders for war crimes. Never has there been any political figures from the UK, US, France, Germany, or Italy. The deaths that occurred in the NATO intervention in Libya demonstrate that the most powerful nations will never face charges for war crimes. Jerry Rawlings was not afraid to also criticize African leaders who acted as collaborators in neocolonial projects. The myth of humanitarian intervention has been used to wage aggressive war around the world and the UN does nothing to prevent this. Rawlings argument is a reminder that African nations must work together to prevent violence directed at them through political and military means. 

Friday, October 23, 2020

The Escalation of Armenia and Azerbaijan Conflict

 


The world is in many ways still dealing with the effects of the collapse of the Soviet Union. Armenia and Azerbaijan when the Soviet Union collapsed became independent nations. No longer under Russian control, old ethnic tensions reemerged. The source of contention is the region known as Nagorno-Karabakh. Both nations claim certain areas of what was at one time an autonomous region as their own. A ceasefire was agreed upon in 1994. Conflagrations once more erupted in 2016. However, the difference in the 2020 clashes reveal that this could escalate into a much larger war. The issue is that a Portion of the Armenian population in Nagorno-Karabakh wants to merge with Armenia. Azerbaijan does not want to lose any territory to its enemy. The Soviet Union created this space to act as a buffer zone against possible ethnic conflict between Armenians and Azerbaijanis. The biggest fear was that any ethnic revolt would would cause the U.S.S.R to fall. Armenian forces occupy territories surrounding the disputed region. Azerbaijan starting in July of 2020 made attempts to gain more territory in   Nagorno-Karabakh. The fighting has intensified with other nations calling on a ceasefire to be made. A large long term war will gain the attention of  Iran, Russia, and Turkey. Armenia and Azerbaijan need to have a permanent peace settlement rather than just temporary ceasefires. A conflict between two nations can easily spread to its neighbors.  Being between both the Caspian and Black Sea makes an Armenia- Azerbaijan war   too geopolitically significant to ignore. 

Tuesday, October 13, 2020

President Uhuru Kenyatta Calls For An End To Sanctions on Zimbabwe

 


President Kenyatta demanded that sanctions placed on Zimbabwe be lifted. Kenya has shown a level of solidarity with another African state, that could be setting a change in foreign policy. Zimbabwe has been under sanctions since 2002 and it has contributed to harming its economy. The reason the UK and US imposed sanctions was based on the elections of 2002, which they claimed were fraudulent. The real motive was about land distribution and the fact that the UK in particular did not honor the Lancaster House Agreement. At the time, President Robert Mugabe took the land that was suppose to be given to those who were victim of the 1960s land theft from white settlers. President Emmerson Mnangagwa  wants to see sanctions lifted, but not at the expense of Zimbabwe's sovereignty. African leaders are growing tired of sanctions imposed by the West arbitrarily. Besides mentioning Zimbabwe, President Uhuru Kenyatta also stated he would like to see sanctions lifted on Sudan and Cuba. Imposing sanctions for  political disagreement or regime change should be considered a violation of international law. Making the people suffer by denying an economic lifeline or basic supplies is a human rights violation. Nations that seek investment in a sanctioned nation could find themselves facing penalties.  Other leaders may join President Kenyatta to put an end to sanctions that clearly have an ulterior motive in mind. Overtime diplomatic relations between Kenya and Zimbabwe may become stronger.   

Monday, October 12, 2020

Alpha Conde Will Seek A Third Term As President of Guinea

 

Alpha Conde has been president of Guinea since 2010. Now, the longtime leader is seeking a third term in what could be the country's most contentious  election. Before the 2013 election there were clashes.   There are fears that such events could repeat in 2020. ECOWAS may respond in a similar manner like it did with Gambia. The African Union and ECOWAS have been known to intervene in states, which suffer from extreme political instability and factionalism. The challenge for African states is keeping free and fair elections and imposing term limits on presidents. Leaders of certain African nations extend their rule through referendums or electoral fraud. Guinea has a total of 12 candidates running for the presidency. The opposition remains fractured, indicating that Conde will most likely get a third term. Voters have until the October 18th to cast their ballots. Post-election violence is common in various countries that do not have a long history of democratic government. Conde compared  to the more authoritarian presidents of the African continent is more of a reformer. Many times he was the opposition to previous administrations.  When elected to his first term, he promised to confront corruption and strengthen  democratic institutions. So far, these has progressed slowly and the public grows more restless. A third Conde term may not bring the change that Guinea desires. 

Tuesday, October 6, 2020

COVID-19 Has Taken 1.4 Million Lives

 


The COVID-19 pandemic has killed up to 1.4 million people globally. The United States, Italy, India, and China have been hit the hardest from the pandemic. African nations have seen lower infection and death rates compared to Europe.   Infections continue to rise around the world and it appears that the public health crisis is far from over. Countries such as Russia and the US are rushing to develop a vaccine. It is not definitely know  if it will be effective. Fears of a second wave also are on the minds of the public and world governments. Public health protection has been shown to be very weak in the face of a pandemic. Private insurance has failed to provide for American citizens. Governments with state funded healthcare have managed the pandemic better in comparison. Countries like Vietnam and Uganda have avoided the worst of the pandemic, even though they are not developed nations. Quarantines, lockdowns, social distancing , and wearing masks have been done to stop the spread of the virus. However, it has to brought an end to the COVID-19 pandemic. Some have resisted these measures, which only makes the public health crisis last longer. Health science has not figured out the best method of defeating the virus. Misinformation and conspiracy theory has created an anti-mask and anti-lockdown movement. More deaths could occur, unless there is drastic action from the UN and WHO. World powers such as US, China, Russia, UK, Germany, and France must cooperate to confront the global health crisis. If this does not happen, the COVID-19 pandemic could last for years.  

Wednesday, September 30, 2020

Growing Demonstrations Against Police Violence in The United States

 


The US is experiencing more protests against the escalation of police violence. The murder of George Floyd and Breonna Taylor by law enforcement has demonstrated  America's distain for its African American population . The police have the ability to murder without punishment or repercussions. The people however, will no longer tolerate such vicious behavior. The demonstrations will continue as long as violence is directed a the African American community. The tactics and methods used by police only reveal that basic rights are gradually be taken away. Both presidential candidates are not committed to police reform, because they know when conditions get worse they will require them to end an uprising. A police force does not exist for fighting crime or protecting the public. Law enforcement's role is to inflict violence on the behalf of the ruling elite and maintain a political system. Simple reforms will not have an effect, if entire police departments are corrupt. Police officers must be changed and incarcerated for murder. There is a growing problem of white supremacist infiltration of police departments in the United States. A growing right-wing extremist  movement is  spreading through the country. Reforms are actively being rejected by police unions. Protests have been peaceful, but there have been cases of  looting and property damage. The majority of  violence comes from police directing their ire at protesters. America continues to descend more into what would be a police state, with civil unrest being common. If change  does not happen it only increases the possibility of mass insurrection.  

Thursday, September 24, 2020

Why Citizens Stop Voting

 Liberal democracy faces many challenges. Corruption, the rise of xenophobic nativist nationalism, and economic inequality have become major concerns. Voter suppression and corporate influence make democracy unattainable. There can never be true freedom if a ruling class has the majority of the power. A more troubling trend for democratic systems is  non-participation. Millions of people in democratic governments do not vote. Citizens who were once enthusiastic about voting become disillusioned with the process. There are multiple reasons why people do not vote. Some may not be interested in politics or understand the system. Others may not see the relevance to their lives. A large portion of the public has become frustrated with politics and the general lack of progress. Voters may consistently vote for a certain candidate or party, but do not see substantive change. Incremental approaches to certain issues just are not adequate when circumstances are dire. Voters want to see or at minimal see that there are tangibles produced. The majority of  liberal democracies have two party systems or multiparty systems. The  dominant parties are either conservative, centre-left, or liberal in political ideology. Voters are normally left with a choice between either two parties. While some countries do have multiple political parties, they just do not have enough support to be formidable. This means citizens of a state do not have a variety in choice, rather two options. Realizing this, those running for political office do not have to produce significant results. The "lesser of two evils" has been a term used in American politics to describe this phenomenon. A leader does not have to do too much for their  constituency,  based on the fact voters will comeback based on the opposition. Both parliamentary and presidential systems function on this voter behavior. Senators, congressmen, and members of parliament became reliant on this fact.  When voters come to the conclusion that change will not happen, they disengage. The lugubrious political reality is that their vote has been weakened and that public servants have failed them. Leaders who seek  revolutionary change are either ostracized or condemned by the wider society. Without  real representation certain groups of society do not vote. Once dedicated voters become disillusioned. Others completely reject political participation, because they believe leaders will never embrace new solutions to persistent problems. 

       A growing number of  loyal voters are becoming disillusioned. This makes them become non-voters which has increased by millions of people. The reason once dedicated voters no longer are active is based on the fact leaders do not fulfill obligations of political office. The expectation is that certain problems will be solved, rather than just empty promises. New solutions and specific policies must be enacted to keep the public engaged. After many elections in a person's life time, without effective change there are many ways in which citizens react. Their are either dramatic turns to the left or right. A genuine leftist party in the case of the US does not exist rather a centrist Democratic Party that fails to adjust to the evolving political conditions. The option for the voter is to keep voting more conservative, which has dire repercussions. The more logical line of thought when faced with unfavorable choices is not to select one. If  either candidate does nothing to improve or at minimum challenge the status quo, then voting would make no sense. Citizens vote with the idea that their voices and concerns will be heard. The only true guarantee of service is being part of the corporate structure, being of the highest socioeconomic status, or connections to lobbying organizations. The average citizen is low priority in relation to donors of political parties. Realizing that unconventional participation has limitations, the frustration only increases. If material conditions get worse, it could mean insurrection in a society. Building an efficient and effective  government takes time. Yet, there are political forces that are actively preventing votes from having power. The Electoral College was designed to act as a consensus among popular election of a president and congressional selection. What the institution really does is prevent the voter's choice. Candidates running  for office are either selected by corporate power or supported by certain think thanks. Grassroots politics remains at a disadvantage compared to corporate politics. The disparity in resources makes it difficult for new leaders not subject to the elite class to be successful. Voters who are knowledgeable at some level understand this. Knowing their is very little chance for reforming the political system, people stop voting. 

       Some reject politics and voting itself because it has become intensely vitriolic. The mere act of disagreement has become grounds for extensive arguments. Expression a certain perspective becomes offensive to others. Although liberal democracies preach freedom, there seems to be a strong impulse for conformity in thought. Even with personal choice to participate or not to do so is met with scorn. Those who refuse to participate are criticized as not doing their duty as a citizen. The more vituperative accusations is that non-voters are either lazy or uninformed. Dedicated voters are shamed for which candidate they decide to vote for. The disrespect for personal choice and a difference in thought is not an example of a functioning democratic system. Rational discussion and debate have been silenced by partisan tribalism. Mass media only causes more political factionalism in countries that are divided among political, racial, class, and religious lines. This explains the developments in the US, France, and UK. Politics has become a large arena of anger and contention, which most people repudiate. It is no wonder that some would not be politically active with so much negativity present in the public sphere. The divide transcends a simple political  left and right paradigm. Sometimes it comes to reality versus politically constructed fiction. The various factions act as if they are in a war against some form of evil. The politics of fear transform into a vicious hate. Citizens see other citizens as enemies. The political contention spreads to other areas of life. Suddenly, everything becomes a political argument. Other perspectives, ideas ,  or opinions are regarded as farcical if they challenge the status quo or the general consensus among political factions. This is why new solutions to economic and social problems are difficult to implement. Devotion to a single mode of thought becomes more important than understanding the challenges of a state.   Non-voters may be disgusted with unprofessional conduct and  erratic behavior. 

        To keep people engaged, citizens need to be provided results . The loss in faith comes from not seeing any form of progress. When there is nothing to show for going to the polls, many may come to the conclusion the leadership is not worth supporting. Change does take time, but a slow gradual approach may not be enough to placate public demands. Voters may keep switching between various types of candidates during election cycles. After awhile this still may not produce the results that voters want to see. Understanding that particular changes will not happen, the  mass of non-voters grows. Those running for office must do more to earn a person's vote. Simply saying you are more qualified or making an empty promise is not enough. There needs to be a specific statement of polices related to economics, foreign, and domestic affairs. A plan of political action must be utilized to demonstrate a candidate for office is serious about the issues effecting average people.  Rhetoric about national unity or returning to some past era does not help people who are struggling now. Poverty and joblessness continues to effect millions. Economic inequality has not been challenged no matter who is elected to office. Racism and police brutality continue to remain a plague society, yet genuine reform has not materialized. Inaction becomes an indirect message to voters that politicians do not care. If leadership does not care about the populace, then there is no reason to vote. People need something to vote for, rather than against. Politicians became too comfortable with not providing anything, while winning elections by simply being an opposition candidate. Non-voters become frustrated, because they think that the majority of leadership does not care about the public. Votes must be earned and candidates must make more effort in terms of outreach. If this is not done more non-voters will increase in liberal democracies. 

      A growing sense of hopelessness has emerged among the section of the public. Voting can not stop the violence that comes from the state or radically alter the social structure. Dramatic change can only happen through revolution. Such events in history rarely came through a ballot box. The American revolution, Haitian revolution, Russian revolution, Mexican revolution, French revolution, and Cuban revolution would have never happened working within the existing political structure. Change could theoretically come through elected bodies on the condition that the ruling elite does not have too much control. Elected officials remain dependent on wealthy donors to finance campaigns. Thus, their ability to produces laws that would benefit the majority are limited.    Leadership would never advocate revolution. Instead there are suggestions of reform. The millions of people who do not vote see it as a practice in futility. Few attempt to understand their actions or see why this feeling of lugubriousness is prevalent. Leaders offer no impressive vision of the future. Politicians have become managers of a system in decline.  Ranked choice and third party options are a possible solution. However, two party systems seek to undermine smaller parties. Multi-party democracies have a number of parties with a certain amount of seats, yet not large enough to form a majority. Run off or snap elections just add to more complications in a political system. To an observer liberal democracy becomes a rather  disorderly form of government. Politics at its core is not about helping people, rather the management of power. The notion of republicanism and a responsive to the will of the citizens is a concept relatively new to human history. These ideas from the Enlightenment  spread in the 19th and 20th century. People become non-voters when it seems as if fighting the political structure is impossible. Voting is suppose to be a method in which a citizens uses their political power. Through powerful organizations, voter suppression, and electoral irregularities the citizen is depowered. Showing resistance to an oppressive political structure by voting may not be effective, because it only legitimizes it.    

        Liberal democracy's biggest threat may not be xenophobic nativist nationalism or economic collapse. It is the fact that the political structure has depowered the average citizen's vote. Corporate power has more representation making the political system less democratic. Some have become so vexed that they have abandoned voting completely. Lobbying, special interest groups, and the power of political action committees undermine the dedicated average voter. The majority do not question the political systems they were raised in. Conversations regarding  these problems are either ignored or labelled conspiracy theory. This explains why reactions to questioning the electoral system or voting in general are met with a negative reaction. Winning elections does not require large masses. Many times just a few groups are enough to make it possible. The large dilemma is when more people become non-voters. What this does is enable the people who do vote to select leaders who may be more extremist in political ideology. Fringe movements can gain more political respectability in such an environment. The unfortunate consequence of freedom also includes the ability to make the wrong choice. Voting is not an indication of a well functioning democracy. Abuse can happen by leaders who were enabled by the voters. If voters select leaders that act against their own interest, then this can have devastating consequences. Votes can also be weaponized. The right-wing political establishment has used people's prejudice and fears to gain votes. The centre-left  manipulates voters by demonizing progressives and socialism. The more astute can comprehend these tactics.  There is a level of corruption in government that needs to be addressed. As long as a ruling elite have an abnormal amount of influence and power, voting will not be enough to stop them. People stop voting due to the fact they have little power. That only leaves the option of general strike, protest, or mass insurrection.   

Monday, September 21, 2020

Protests Break Out in Thailand

 


Protests have broken out with Thai citizens demanding more protection of rights and accountability in government.  There is a difference in this developing movement. The monarchy appears to getting criticism and constitutional reform may be an objective. The military and monarchy have long been the stable force in Thai government. The structure by nature has been repressive  cracking down on press freedom and basic human rights. Since the military coup in 2014, Prime Minister Prayuth Chan-ocha has been leading Thailand with little to show in terms of reform. The protests he states are endangering the security of the nation. The demand for constitutional reform will not go away as long as the youth remain dissatisfied. The alliance between the military and monarchy has been a hinderance to the political participation of the average Thai. Calls are growing for a general strike. Thailand has had coups before and mass political unrest. Prime Minister Chan-ocha may not be defeated so easily as long as the military supports him. He has pledged his loyalty to the monarchy and so far that collaboration has not been broken. Student groups have become more politically active organizing reform rallies. The demands include ending military influence in politics, a new constitution, ending royal offices, and dismantling the royal guards.  

Sunday, September 20, 2020

The Death of Ruth Bader Ginsberg and The Effect on American Politics

 


A Supreme Court seat now remains vacant. Ruth Bader Ginsberg passed away from a long battle with cancer. The United States divided  politically,  will have another major topic of contention. The Republican Party wants the vacancy filled as soon as possible. The Democratic Party wants the a new judge selected after  the election. It seems more likely that the next Supreme Court justice will be picked by which candidate wins the 2020 election.  If Donald Trump wins the election it means he will be able to select the next Supreme Court justice. That means the  Supreme Court  could be more conservative leaning in its rulings. A Biden presidency may not produce a liberal justice either. Joe Biden from a political perspective is more of a centrist than a liberal. Ginsberg was a Clinton appointment , although that was the era of New Democrat political ideology. There is no guarantee that Joe Biden will select a justice with similar liberal credentials. The judge that takes Ginsberg's  position could dramatically impact the laws and the US Constitution itself. There has been a dramatic reverse in basic civil liberties and civil rights in the US. Basic human rights are being violated and without a Supreme Court that values the rights of citizens there will be no protection. This is why selection of a Supreme Court justice is important. 

Thursday, September 17, 2020

President Alexander Lukashenko Closes Borders With Poland and Lithuania

 



Belarus is closing its borders with Poland and Lithuania. President Alexander Lukashenko is struggling to remain in power after waves of protests after the controversial election. Concerned about possible European Union intervention, President Lukashenko visited Russia seeking possible military assistance. The army has been posted on high alert. The border with Ukraine will also see more troops present. These actions are more complex than an authoritarian president to maintain power. Belarus is attempting to stop Baltic and Eastern European countries from having external influence in the country. Belarus wants to have closer ties both economic and political to Russia, while undermining NATO influence. Oddly, Latvia was not mentioned  by Lukashenko, but as time passes relations will deteriorate. The real threat is some form of war or regime change encouraged by the EU. Protests continue and many have been jailed as a result of  the presidential election. Belarus has been repressive for decades, but the sudden interest from France, Germany, and the US demonstrates an ulterior motive. Poland and Lithuania could be a launching point for a military intervention. Doing so would undermine President Vladimir Putin who remains an ally of Lukashenko. Calls for Alexander Lukashenko's resignation have been made, but he has insisted he will remain in office.   

Friday, August 28, 2020

Prime Minister Shinzo Abe Resigns

 


Prime Minister Shinzo Abe announced his resignation. One of Japan's longest serving prime ministers will be exiting due to health concerns. Since 2012 he has embarked on a program that was attempting to change Japan economically and politically. Abe sought to have the pacifist constitution replaced. He attempted to get women more active in the Japanese workforce. Abenomics was the term used for his policies regarding the revitalization of the Japanese economy. The COVID-19 pandemic caused challenges for the Japanese workforce and the government was criticized for it management of the crisis. Shinzo Abe stated that his colitis was becoming more intense over the following weeks. Seeing as there is no cure and it has become difficult to treat, this would have effected his duties. A sudden change in leadership could change the political conditions in Asia. The growing tension between the US and China will be a factor. North Korea has remained a regional issue. The question of what is the best plan for economic recovery remains unanswered. Abe has been a political survivor. He first resigned in 2007. Making a comeback, his premiership was accused of scandal. The land sales scandal exposed that Abe and his family were giving preferential treatment to schools politically close to them. Japan is now in the process of selecting a new prime minister.  

Wednesday, August 26, 2020

Kellyanne Conway's Controversial Comments

 


Kellyanne Conway had defended President Donald Trump's behavior and policies throughout his first term. There is a pattern in which the administration has women, make excuses for his past sexual misconduct. Conway during the 2016 campaign  received much criticism for her comments regarding rape and sex crimes. She stated that "rape would not exist if women were physically stronger." Conway articulated this  on a panel discussion from PBS program To The Contrary . The panel was talking about women in combat roles and Kellyanne was using her statement to exclude women from frontline combat positions. Her statement reflects major ignorance about rape and sex crimes. Men in prison are subject to custodial rape and children can be victim to molestation. Rape can occur with the presence of alcohol, which has been an issue on college campuses. Kellyanne Conway's statement demonstrates that there are women in the Republican Party and the conservative movement that assist in keeping misogyny alive. It was announced that Conway will be resigning from the White House staff. Trump was able to get some women voters, but overall he will struggle in 2020. Many of the women that serve in his administration do not advocate for women in terms of equal pay, reproductive rights, or addressing sexual violence. Simply having a woman in a cabinet position does not ensure women's rights will be protected.     

Monday, August 24, 2020

Namibia Rejects Germany's Reparations

 


Germany made an attempt at reconciliation with its colonial past by making an offer of reparations to Namibia. However, this seems like an empty gesture considering the amount of death that occurred between 1904 and 1907.  The Herero and Namaqua were targeted by the German Empire. The rebellion against German colonial rule resulted in the violence from  Kaiser Wilhelm II. Germany wanted to be on equal footing with other European powers and engaged in imperial conquest. The rebellion was crushed, but German Southwest Africa was lost to the Allies during World War I. President Hage Geingob rejected Germany's offer on the basis the amount of reparations funds remains too low. Negotiations for compensation have been  conducted since 2015, with little progress. Descendants of the few survivors of the genocide are demanding a total of  $4,000,000,000 in compensation. Germany continues to remain more intractable in regards to compensation. While the two countries do maintain relations, they may become strained. The offers Germany proposes have been revealed to be 10,000,000 euros ($11,000,000) . This proposed agreement is not acceptable to the people who lost their lives and a nation still vexed about  past colonial practice. Chancellor Angela Merkel has not made any attempts to increase compensation  or reparation amounts. If Germany was able to pay compensation to Israel for the Holocaust, there should be limited dispute about doing the same for Namibia. Germany has a stronger economy in comparison to other European Union states. If  Namibia cannot get a compensation amount that is acceptable, it should consider dismantling diplomatic relations. Apologies are not enough to eliminate  the legacy of colonial  aggression. The negotiations may take longer, however Namibia has the support of other African nations. The African Union could start taking interest in member states that want compensation from other countries such as France, the UK, Spain, Belgium, and Portugal.  

Friday, August 21, 2020

Aung San Suu Kyi Initiates the Panglong Peace Talks

 


Myanmar still remains a country in conflict, even with a civilian government. Ethnic conflict between the Kachin, Shan, and Kayin  continues with clashes being frequent. Suu Kyi is not fully in control, with the military still retaining significant influence in government. The Panglong peace talks were designed to end conflict through a permanent settlement. This is further complicated by the Rohingya crisis, which has created a large number of refugees. Aung Suu Kyi was criticized for her handling of the situation, which caused damaged relations between the US and EU nations. The peace talks cannot advance as long as the military remains an obstacle. The attempt at establishing a democratic system becomes more fragile, the longer war continues. Myanmar could go through a process of balkanization if insurgencies continue. Racism and prejudice must be confronted if the country is to remain whole. A federal system or semi-autonomous regional systems may be required to address historical grievances. Having another election will not solve these complex political and ethnic problems. Already frustration is beginning to grow. As Myanmar becomes more shunned by the West, it has more closer to China. This increases the likelihood it will be targeted for sanctions. Aung San Suu Kyi has announced that she intends to run for president in the November elections. If a peace deal or some form of agreement is not reached it would make attaining office more difficult. Peace may have to come from a strong executive branch that limits military power. If she does win office, it would need more authority to make a change in policy.    

Thursday, August 20, 2020

Mali Falls to a Military Coup

 


Mali has faced both political and social challenges. The ineffective government has collapsed giving way to a military coup. The resignation of President Keita has left a power void in the country. Since the coup, the African Union voted to suspend Mali. The coup leaders have promised that elections will take place. This is uncertain considering Mali may not function like Sudan after the fall of a leader. Azawad and the fall out from the fall of Qaddafi continues to effect the country even after nine years. The coup leaders call themselves the National Committee for the Salvation of the People. Some want President Ibrahim Keita reinstated according to some sources at the AU. Prior to the coup, his administration was accused of corruption, economic mismanagement, and interference in legislative elections. Demonstrations expanded with people becoming more frustrated with the government. Mali could face an AU intervention, civil war, and further civil disturbance if stability is not established. If problems of the people go unaddressed, the situation will only intensify.  

Monday, August 17, 2020

New Zealand Will Delay Elections Due to COVID -19

 


Prime Minister Jacinda Arden announced that elections will be delayed at least until October. This is in response to the increase in COVID-19 infections. Observers thought that New Zealand had beat the disease and pandemic. Celebrating too early was a major miscalculation. Opening too soon as other countries have learned resulted in a wider spread of infection. While a new sense of urgency has come into the public consciousness, few have questioned the delay in  parliamentary elections . Delaying the elections would seem to give incumbents an advantage otherwise not present under normal circumstances. If New Zealand has a fully operational postal service, casting votes should not be an issue. The only problem would be ensuring that every vote cast is counted. The pandemic has finally resulted in one of the public's worst fears. World leaders will exploit the crisis to increase their power and gain unfair advantage. The political opposition the National Party also favors delays in elections. Judith Collins has went as far as to suggest making the elections be held in November. Being the leader of the opposition, there should be at least some alternative. The country enacted some of the strictest lockdowns and still are struggling with the pandemic. This should not be tolerated by citizens who want to vote and value the democratic process. Other countries such as Uganda and Vietnam have used COVID-19 as an excuse to limit freedom of their populations. Both Democratic and Authoritarian regimes use the pandemic to gain more political power.  

Sunday, August 16, 2020

Angela Davis on Feminism

 


Angela Davis never considered herself a feminist. She stated "I'm not a feminist, I'm a revolutionary." The reason being was that the movement was white dominated and at times used women of different races to advance their cause at other's expense. Without intersectionality the feminist movement is nothing more than a special interest group for white women. African American women contributing to it to a degree broke the long term project for black empowerment in the United States. Fractured movements for liberation will never be successful. Intersectionality has limitations, because various groups have different objectives. Women are divided by race, class, gender, and sexual orientation.  Society functions as an unequal hierarchy. The reality is that white women face little oppression in modern day America. African American, Latino, Asian, and poor women face significant barriers. The concept of inclusion will not solve these problems or emphasis on diversity.  The goal should be acceptance of different types of people. The only logical conclusion is complete dismantling and replacement of the system. Mainstream feminism will not do that and simply has no more relevance in liberation. Third and the emergent fourth wave feminism are gradually becoming more divisive. The path to women's equality rests on the defeat of  neocolonial imperialism, neo-liberal capitalism, and a racist society. 

Thursday, August 13, 2020

Israel and The United Arab Emirates Confirm Peace Agreement

 


Prince Mohammad Bin Zayed and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu confirmed that Israel and the UAE are set to establish diplomatic relations. This sudden recognition for peace was facilitated by the United States. The agreement states that Israel will not annex the West Bank in exchange for bilateral ties with the UAE. This seems difficult to imagine that Israel would refrain from its wider territorial ambitions. Considering that the Lukid Party uses anti-Arab racism to energize the right-wing of Israeli politics. There could also be another ulterior motive. Israel may be attempting to build a gulf state coalition to confront Iran. Doing so would make it easier for Israel to conduct military action. Saudi Arabia already is engaged in a proxy war with Iran in Yemen. The Trump administration wants to present this as a diplomatic victory, however complications may just be starting. The Palestinians have limited support in their efforts to establish a state. Settlement construction continues and the occupation still persists. Egypt and Jordan used to be dedicated supporters of the cause for Palestinian national self-determination until they open relations with Israel. Without support from Arab nations or UN resolutions Palestinians could fall victim to further Israeli violence. There still remains the possibility negotiations could collapse. Besides political agreements, the UAE wants economic cooperation with Israel.      

Monday, August 10, 2020

Protests Sparked Over The Presidential Election in Belarus

 


Belarus held its presidential elections on Sunday. The results announced that longtime incumbent Alexander Lukashenko won the election with 80% of the vote. The issue which opposition leaders have raised is that the elections were not free or fair. Protests have broken out in various cities across the European nation. Russia's response was to congratulate President Lukashenko's election victory. Germany has been skeptical of the political situation in the country. As demonstrations continue to grow, this will most likely attract foreign powers. the opposition candidate Sviatlana Tsikanouskaya has attracted more support. There are fears Belarus could follow a path similar to Ukraine. An internal crisis can be used as an excuse for intervention by the EU. There is no indication that the opposition is being controlled by foreign powers for the sake of regime change. Belarus could be entering another political phase and the citizens may  desire large scale change. Alexander Lukashenko has been in power since 1994 and has faced little  formidable opposition. Sviatlana Tsikanouskaya has ran as an independent building a coalition across the political spectrum. The challenge is keeping such an alliance unified. Being against the government or current  administration is not enough to ensure a  promising future. Repression has gotten worse with journalists and opposition leaders put under arrest. Belarus faces a crisis that consists of  authoritarian government, political oppression, threat of  geopolitical maneuvering between Russia and the EU.   

Wednesday, August 5, 2020

Lebanon's Increasing Instability


Lebanon has experienced a bombing in Beirut. The country continues to struggle with with economic decline and a leadership unable to solve the country's problems. Protests over unemployment and increased taxation has brought the country to the brink. The explosion of the port in the capital does not appear to be an act of terrorism. Many theories have been expressed, yet the government remains silent. Some have speculated that it was a strike by Israel to counter Hezbollah. Protests have been occuring since October of 2019 and there is no end in sight. Food security has declined, currency had rapidly devalued, and the population grows more vexed. The ruling elite have allowed Lebanon to fall into long term crisis that could spread regionally. A civil war in Syria and a more aggressive Israel could spark a larger war. Iran has significant involvement in Lebanon. Iranian influence has been growing immensely since Iraq ceased to be stable. Currently, the government of Lebanon has launched an investigation into the port explosion. There is little faith from the population that substantial action will be taken. The explosion could have been caused by the ignition of ammonium nitrate. Although there were not mass amounts of deaths, rebuilding will take large amounts of funding. With little revenue and limited possibility of assistance, Lebanon could be heading for mass insurrection. The removal of rubble and debris has become a symbol of a country on the verge of collapse. Options are limited. Lebanon can either seek loans from either Saudi Arabia or France. Neither of these options are favorable. France a former colonizer of Lebanon would make citizens more suspicious of the government. Saudi Arabia has made attempts to make Lebanon another front in their regional competition with Iran. Whatever happens next, peaceful solutions are limited.   

Tuesday, July 28, 2020

A General Introduction to Fascism

Fascism was  a far-right political ideology  that supported  aggressive nationalism, militarism, and anti-democratic government. Between 1919 and 1945  fascism  became a threat to global security with its desire to eradicate opposing political ideologies. The reason it originated in Europe was due to the culture, ideas, and imperial political philosophy. European countries were at one time mostly monarchies. Absolutism became a model of government when European states became more centralized. Government power was challenged by the Enlightenment, which demanded that the state should limit its power and respect the rights of citizens. By the 19th century Europe experienced a wave of ethnic nationalism and demands for constitutional government. The political experiment was not successful in all European states. The age of modern imperialism and a new emphasis on racial identity stifled genuine democratic revolution. France and the British Empire emerged as the strongest European powers. Germany and Italy went through a process of becoming unified nation-states, with a desire to compete. Large power competition and imperial ambitions resulted in World War I. Germany was defeated and forced to accept harsh terms of the Versailles Treaty. Italy was among the victors, but did not gain anything from siding with the Allies. The Russian, Ottoman, and German empires collapsed creating new states in Europe.   The social and political devastation created an unstable atmosphere in which fascism could flourish. Economic collapse, civil unrest, and unemployment were so common that the people looked for order in a chaotic world. Fascism emerged as a popular mass movement branching off into Italian Fascism and German Nazism . These branches of fascism with some minor differences shared certain traits : the love of warfare, social Darwinist  thought, violence as a political tool, and racism. Fascism was the total rejection of humanism, Enlightenment philosophy, and liberalism. Fascism as a global political force was defeated in World War II, but its concepts and ideas appear in fringe movements and hate groups.
    The origins of fascism were rooted in the ideas of philosopher  Georges Sorel.  The French philosopher's ideology would have a profound influence on the thought of Benito Mussolini. Sorel contributed to the concept of national syndicalism, which was a reactionary and authoritarian movement in France. Prior to this development syndicalism was a leftist movement with socialist objectives. The syndicalist wanted to have Marxists and anarchists collaborate in a unified revolutionary front. This attempt failed miserably causing many to become disillusioned. This was the point in the late 19th century in which syndicalism broke into factions, with the authoritarian section becoming more powerful. Charles Maurras of  Action  franciase  would become a political collaborator with Sorel. These new groups in France were opposed to liberalism. pacifism, secularism, and the growing individualism in western society. The Sorelians and Action franciase formed an alliance in 1910. Both Sorel and Maurras believed that humanitarianism was degrading the quality of European civilization. France and the whole of the continent needed dramatic revival. Benito Mussolini who would become leader of the first fascist state read Sorel's works. What captivated him the most was the idea of national myth. The shift to the far-right came for Mussolini when World War I broke out. Italy he believed that the war was an opportunity to rise to greatness on the international stage. This caused criticism and condemnation form his fellow socialists who disagreed with his opinion on intervention. Expelled from the Italian Socialist Party Mussolini became a devoted nationalist. The national myth was in the view of Sorel a great story to energize the masses to embrace patriotism. Through the national myth values of a country can be officially established. The national myth Mussolini developed was that Italy was destined to establish a New Roman Empire. Adolf Hitler dreamed of establishing a Third Reich that would last 1000 years. The fascists thought of their people as unique with the right to rule and conquer the world.


National myths were more powerful than actual facts. George Sorel embraced the notion of a new ideology saving Europe from social and political decay. The desire for rebirth to a dynamic Europe was a common theme among these movements. Prior to World War I, fascism if it had existed would not have been as popular. The following destabilization  of  the war, the Versailles Treaty, and the Great Depression allowed for Sorel's ideas to be put into practice. He did not live to see how it would develop. Before his death in 1922 he wrote " the fascists are not entirely wrong to invoke my opinions."  This would have been the movement George Sorel wanted to spread. The threats to Europe were liberalism and Marxism in his view and a far-right movement must combat these elements. 
      Fascism was viciously opposed to Marxism. . This was no surprise seeing as both Marxism and  communism disagreed with fascism on economics, politics, and class conflict. Totalitarian Stalinist Communism may have been similar in regards to  oppression and the function of the police state, but were ideologically opposed. Fascism wanted war and thought it was a natural state. Marxism had the desire for world revolution that would overthrow the ruling classes.Fascism did change the political and social order, but there was no desire to expunge the ruling classes or traditional conservatives. The class division that existed was the natural order and fits into the idea of hierarchy based on social Darwinism. Poverty and class exploitation was an example of survival of the fittest. Race and nationality was more important than class. Humanity from the perspective of the fascist is a war like species. Races will be at war with one another, because it is the natural order. Marxists and communists did not want mass global conflict. Fascism believed in  aggressive nationalism and that imperial expansion was required for survival. Italy's invasion of Ethiopia and Germany's  invasion of Poland demonstrated this. Fascism's hatred of Marxism was also economic. Fascism supported capitalism as long as it was in service to the state. Fascistic corporatism was based around the idea that big business and totalitarian government could bring stability to European countries suffering under the Great Depression. Free enterprise, with some controls  would by this reasoning bring back pre-World War I prosperity. The Marxist economic policy was to reject free markets and replace it with  a command economy. Nazism was opposed to capitalism and communism, but it was based around anti-semitic  conspiracy theory. Hitler's view was that the Jews manipulated international finance capital. Communism and capitalism were part of a large Jewish conspiracy aimed at weakening  Germany. national socialism used in the context of  German politics had a different meaning. Resources would be developed cooperatively with minimal  interference in capitalist enterprise. The fascists would ignore class disparity, but instead promise a vision even distribution of capital among the large industrialists and working class. This promise was not kept when the Nazi and Fascist Party consolidated power. Corporations and  major industrialists were favored over small business. Workers found that labor unions were banned in both Germany and Italy. Nationalism and support for the state was more important than worker's rights. The fascist movement was mindful not to follow a similar economic policy of its predecessors. Instead they focused on infrastructure and increasing employment. While there was industrial expansion, the real intent was to build a formidable war machine.  Fascism need Marxism as an excuse to enact political measures to hinder public protest. 
        Militarism was a common characteristic of the fascist regimes. The notion was that a nation needed to expand or else it would  decline. The population needed to embrace a pugnacious mentality. Propaganda was used to psychologically prepare the German and Italian public for  a large conflict. The reason World War II happened was not only because of the Great Depression, but fascism's rise as a popular form of European political thought. Imperialism was necessary for fascism's existence. A political philosophy that preached violence could only survive by the highest form of violence known: war. During the 1930s both Italy and Germany began taking territory through invasion or annexation. The justification was that certain people were part of weaker nations and stronger nations had the right to conquer them. Racist claims that colonized people needed European control were often used as an excuse for aggression. The whole of industry, culture, and society was preparing for conflict in fascist states. Boys who were in the Hitler Youth were given early lessons in armed combat, so in the future they would become soldiers. Nazi Germany's economic recovery revolved around the production of tanks, airplanes, and guns. Fascist societies were transformed into supporting military values. Obedience to authority, courage, and service to the state was glorified.  Militarism exists as part of a struggle for the survival of the fittest in the context of social Darwinism. Strong nations will naturally dominate weaker ones.  

     
Nations should not seek a peace in the fascist ideology. Diplomacy, however could still be employed to reach goals of territorial expansion. The Munich conference created the false image that Germany and Italy wanted  a stable peace.German troops later invaded Czechoslovakia and Italy absorbed Albania.   Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union signed a non-aggression pact, which had a major security impact on France.  Closing off the eastern front, allowed Germany more space to counter the British Empire and France simultaneously. The Third Reich was to be a large Germanic empire, which would rival that of the Holy Roman Empire and the unified German Empire. Italy's concept of New Rome was to reassert the country's level of power it had in the ancient world.  Militarism was part of the fascist ideology to encourage settlement in conquered areas. War was not just for glory, rather it was to  establish more space for  their populations. Lebensraum was a political concept utilized making the claim the German state demands territory to settle to support its citizens. War and militarism served other purposes other than empire building. It was a method of eliminating competing political and economic systems. Fascism could not coexist with democratic governments. Having a competing political system would always be a challenge to ambitions of imperial domination.
      Fascism sought to eliminate democracy, liberalism, and individualism. These ideas and political systems were a threat to the movement. It was not enough to liquidate opposition within their own borders. Conformist thought had to be imposed upon the whole world. Parliamentary democracy to fascist was an ineffective system. It was chaotic by nature and could not solve the problems efficiently. People do not rule themselves in the fascist convictions. They need a strong and determined leader to assert control. Dictatorship was needed to protect the state.  Liberalism was viewed as decadent and selfish. The state should matter more than the rights of the individual. Pluralism only produced inaction and aided the spread of instability. The people as a collective in terms of thought and action are better off being directed by a leader not restrained in political power. Fascists articulated this as a cause for the greater good, but  was designed to curtail civil rights and liberties. One leader has the majority of political power and one party dominates government.  The Nazi Party dominated the courts, schools, churches, and all organizations in Germany. The Italian Fascist Party also worked on a similar model having complete control of the press and entertainment. The assault on liberalism also took a cultural tone. Fascists presented themselves as defenders of traditional values and liberals part of a degenerate culture. This attracted many non-fascist conservatives who were fearful of leftists coming to power through elections.  Women's roles  were to be strictly that of wife and mother. Reproducing as much children as possible was their national duty, for those children would become builders of the state. The family unit was to be part of the state mechanism. Fascism wanted to replace the individual with the idea of  a "new man." The "new man" would be an person willing to sacrifice themselves for the fascist cause and create a stronger society. What would emerge from this process would be a totalitarian society in which life revolves around one political belief system . War with France and Great Britain was inevitable. If Britain had fallen, the United States would have been the next logical target of fascist aggression. Fascism could not have international competitors when advancing geopolitical objectives. 
       Racism and aggressive nationalism constituted a major part of fascist ideology. Hitler and Mussolini exalted their people above others, while vituperating groups considered inferior. Nazi Germany persecuted the European Jewish population resulting in the Holocaust. During Mussolini's regime more violence was inflicted in Libya to make it more Italian.Anti-semitism  and Anti-African racism were part of the  fascist ideology. Italy was in comparison less anti-Semitic , however enacted its race laws when forming a closer alliance with Germany in 1938. Much of the racism fascism espoused came from eugenics, pseudoscience, and traditional European colonial prejudice. Nazism promoted the myth that the Germans were a special people. The Aryan race was the greatest contributor to world civilization in Nazi ideology. The master race was destined to rule the world and dominate the inferior races. Racism extended beyond just skin color, there was an effort to make fascist nations culturally pure. German and Italian culture in the fascist belief system was seen as superior to other nationalities. Internationalism was also rejected, even though fascist movements emerged in various countries. Brazil, Chile, and South Africa had active fascist movements. The British Union of Fascists and the Silver Legion in the US were the most notable groups in the western democracies. Aggressive nationalism was connected to racism. A people that sees themselves as superior to others is more willing to dehumanize people who are different. Scapegoating and prejudice on a massive scale makes it easier to manipulate a population into acts of mass violence. Teaching youth to hate also ensured fascism could spread. The result was genocide and  numerous atrocities during World War II. Gypsies, Slavs, and Afro-Germans became victims of the Nazi regime.  Social Darwinist theory was then applied to other groups. The disabled, gay, or terminally ill became subject to persecution. Inequality, discrimination, and murder became justified because of the idea that certain people were  genetically inferior. Fascism dehumanized various races, religions, and nationalities.
     Populism was used to ensure political factionalism or protest was not possible. Fascist parties by saying they were with the people allowed them to manipulate public frustration. Public anger could be directed at their political opponents such as liberals and Marxists.  Fascists sided with the upper class elite, even though they espoused grievances with elements of the capitalist system. German populism during this period evolved from reactionary theories of  19th century philosophy. The Volk concept was a reaction to the Enlightenment. This group of thinkers espoused nationalism , the superiority of German culture, and the need for unification in the 1800s. This group became more racist and extreme, breaking away from historicists. The Nazi adopted this far-right philosophical ideas. The German people these ideas expressed had a unique destiny. Adolf Hitler would constantly express that the Germans were destined for greatness. Benito Mussolini presented himself as a relatable figure and a friend of the common man. Fascist presented liberals as bourgeoisie elites that lacked the fortitude to confront economic and political challenges. Farmers, shopkeepers, and workers became more responsive to the fascist message due to populist articulation. The upper class elites favored this, because it directed outrage related to wealth inequality at another target. Presenting fascist as defenders of the people became useful propaganda, which  their opponents could not neutralize. The hardships of the common person were not the elite that cause the depression rather the enemies of the fascist movement. The fascist movement by using populism as a political tool attempted to show that it was a real revolutionary movement. Such an assertion was spurious considering it still supported cultural traditionalism. Although Christianity was not compatible with fascist belief, it was  useful in manipulating older conservatives. Using the language of rejuvenation of society attracted younger sections of the population. Without populism the  fascist dictatorships could not have consolidated power.
         Fascism was defeated with the collapse of the Axis powers. The original founders may be gone, but the dangerous ideas they developed still thrive. Neofascism remains active in certain parts of Europe. The fall of communism as a political force caused serious economic consequences in  the former Soviet Union. Far-right extremist groups, anti-immigrant organizations, and neo-Nazis have emerged. Hate groups also pose a serious threat to democratic societies. These groups remain small, however support could be growing in a new wave of  global xenophobia. Refugees fleeing conflict zones has induced fear making people more prone to accept more extremist leaders. Anxiety surrounding the global economy also adds to this political shift. The difference between the neofascist and the fascist of the 20th century is that the current pretends to like liberal democracy. Neofascist  rarely state that they want to dismantle the system. Rather, a gradual replacement with an authoritarian model is the objective. Establishing a totalitarian government would be difficult in countries that have a long history of  democracy. The Wiemar Republic was a new political experiment for Germany. The majority of Italy's history was rule by monarchy. The transition to constitutional monarchy was easier in comparison to other European states. It failed to deal with the repercussions of a devastating World War I  intervention. Under political and economic pressure it could not resist fascist takeover. Economic instability, corruption, and poor leadership make democratic systems vulnerable to violent ideologies.The destruction unleashed has puzzled historians, sociologists, and psychologists.   The fascist movement was a dark period in world history. Fascism legacy is one of death and ruin.

References 

Soucy, Robert. "Fascism." Britannica Encyclopedia.  Britannica Encyclopedia Inc ., 2 Jan.2020  

Hulling. Mark. Contemporary Political Ideologies Movements and Regimes. New York : 
           Harper Collins College Publishers, 1996. 

Ebenstein, William. Great Political Thinkers Plato to Present. New York : 
             Holt, Rinehart and Winston Inc, 1960. 

Sabine, George. A History of Political Theory. New York : Holt, Rinehart and Winston Inc, 1961.


Tuesday, July 21, 2020

Omar al-Bashir Will Be Charged For The 1989 Coup

Bashir waves to supporters in a rally in 1989.


Omar al-Bashir's  trial began today for the 1989 coup. While he has been charged for crimes against the civilians during protests and allegations of corruption,  this charge is different. His presidency was removed by extralegal means by the military. There was another coup in 2019, which saw his regime collapse. The protests were not enough to remove him from power, but loss of military support was. The trial cannot be fair or completely unbiased considering a new government was formed from another military coup. The court should seek to maintain a proper due process. There were suggestions that Omar al-Bashir could be put in custody of the ICC. This would be a mistake and undermine Sudanese sovereignty. If it is proven he committed crimes in Sudan, then a Sudanese court should charge him. Omar al-Bashir  can be charged for war crimes in the Second Sudanese Civil War and the intervention in Yemen. The only reason charges related to Yemen will be excluded is due to Saudi Arabia. Sudan continues to be involved in Saudi Arabia's war, despite reduction of troops. This withdraw could strain relations between Sudan and Saudi Arabia. Bashir's lawyers could use the current political situation and the fact he was not voted out of office to their advantage. The trial will certainly generate much interest and conversation throughout Africa. 

Saturday, July 18, 2020

John Lewis US Congressman and Civil Rights Icon Has Passed Away


John Lewis a longtime civil rights activist and congressman passed away from pancreatic cancer. He served as US Representative for Georgia's 5th congressional district since 1987. As a young man, Lewis was the chairman of SNCC. John Lewis became director of the Voter Education Project in 1970 and held that position until 1977. John Lewis was dedicated to keeping Dr. Martin Luther King's vision of peace and racial equality alive by being involved in causes for social justice. He opposed the US invasion of Iraq, promoted immigration reform, and supported gun control efforts. His death came at an unfortunate period in which America has become more divided and prejudiced. John Lewis' seat will be up for election, which is critical politically. As the nation continues to grapple with violence from law enforcement, racism, and xenophobia it is a reminder that progress can easily be reversed. The laws of segregation may have been defeated,but the ideology and hate have not. Lewis was an advocate of non-violent resistance. This tactic may not be useful in a country that is now threatening the use of military force against protesters. A new generation must become more innovative in techniques of stopping government abuse. Congressman Lewis worked to ensure human rights were respected in country that never really valued them. Civil rights and civil liberties are openly being attacked by a far-right resurgence . American citizens must undermine and fight this movement for the preservation of  free society.  

Friday, July 17, 2020

RIP C.T. Vivian ( 1924-2020)

Longtime civil rights activist Cordy Tindell Vivian passed away at the age of 95. A friend and ally of Martin Luther King, he was a prominent figure in the civil rights movement. C.T. Vivian founded the Nashville Christian Leadership Conference. He served as national director for affiliates of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference  . Vivian continued to remain active even though the movement had come to a conclusion. During the 1970s he established the Black Action Strategies and Information Center, which worked to increase  workforce integration. C.T Vivian would continue to lecture and do public speaking for human rights promotion.