Sunday, January 12, 2025
Ecuador and Guatemala's Involvement In Haiti
Wednesday, September 11, 2024
The Paris Peace Conference (1919)
Friday, June 14, 2024
Senator Joseph Biden Explains The Motivation For Support of Israel (1986)
Monday, February 19, 2024
President Obama Greets Qaddafi At The G8 (2009)
Friday, November 10, 2023
Anti-Serb Austro-Hungarian Empire Propaganda (1914)
Tuesday, September 26, 2023
Haiti Could Be Invaded By Kenya
Monday, September 11, 2023
Representative Barbara Lee Votes Against The Afghanistan War (2001)
Thursday, September 8, 2022
Queen Elizabeth And The Imperial Legacy
Thursday, March 24, 2022
Madeleine Albright Supports Sanctions on Iraq (1996)
Madeleine Albright (1937-2022) who served as Secretary of State under the William Jefferson Clinton administration, supported sanctions on Iraq. The sanctions resulted in high amounts of death and a decline in Iraq's living standards. When asked about this in a CBS interview, she stated the price was worth it. Such blatant disregard for human life demonstrates a lack of concern for human rights. Arms embargoes and sanctions against government officials is legitimate. Harming the population is nothing more than an act of warfare. Albright was instrumental in pushing NATO expansion and intervention in the Balkans. The results of this were the bombing of Kosovo and the loss of trust among Russia. This policy of continuing sanctions only made it easier for the Bush administration to launch an aggressive war. Assertive multilateralism was nothing more than a policy of various countries invading others for the sake of geopolitical ambitions. Her image was one of a humanitarian and feminist icon, but her actions were in service to ensuring US hegemony in both Europe and the Middle East. That image was more so a creation of the American press. Iraqis would continue to suffer under sanctions from 1991 to 2003.
Thursday, November 11, 2021
The American Militarist State
Wednesday, October 20, 2021
Muammar Qaddafi Calls on Libyans To Resist NATO (2011)
Ten years ago Muammar Qaddafi was assassinated. Libya was in a state of civil war, however this was induced by the UK, France, US, and NATO countries. Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates also contributed to regime change in Libya. Protests did occur in response to the events in Tunisia. These were peaceful demonstrations. Armed groups and terrorist organizations not associated with protestors started violence. Libya descended in civil war and NATO began a bombing campaign. Qaddafi called on all Libyans to resist aggressive war waged by NATO. The African Union was seeking to end the conflict with diplomacy. This was ignored by both the UN and EU. The violent destruction of a prosperous African country was planned for decades. Libya's oil resources and influence in the global south made it a target of Western powers. Qaddafi earned much respect for his contribution to anti-colonial freedom struggles and the fight against white minority rule regimes in the Southern African region. His death was a major blow to the African continent.
Wednesday, April 28, 2021
The Afghan War, US Withdraw , and The Failure of Nation Building
The Biden administration has announced its intention of US withdraw from Afghanistan. The exit of US troops will be gradual with September 11th being the set deadline. The Afghan War has been the longest conflict in US history. The devastation will have a lasting impact of the people living in the Central Asian nation. The war was overseen by four presidential administrations and no solution was reached. This withdraw is not American troops just leaving a deteriorating country. The United States was defeated similar to the Vietnam conflict. Slowly the mendacious claims about democracy promotion and fighting terrorism have unraveled. Nation building projects do not exist for the sake of human rights. The objective is to advance a neocolonial imperialist agenda. The war in Afghanistan was presented to the public as a dire emergency that required military force. The 9/11 attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon was used as a justification for humanitarian intervention into Afghanistan. The target was Al-Qaeda and governments that were providing them bases. The Taliban refused to extradite Osama Bin Laden, because they wanted evidence he was directly involved in the attacks. When this occurred the US then considered the Taliban as an enemy. Out of this grew a popular fiction. The idea that Al-Qaeda and the Taliban were a giant military threat emerged. Al-Qaeda was presented as a omnipotent organization that was responsible for terrorism across the globe. Terrorist groups existed before Al-Qaeda and many were working independently from one another. Osama Bin Laden did not have complete control over these terrorist groups in other countries. Bin Laden was more so a patron of some groups rather than a leader or fighter. The War on Terror was a justification for the US expanding into Central Asia and the Middle East. President George W. Bush started the Afghan War and his successors continued it with the hope of pushing further into the region. Beyond just mere economic exploitation and increasing geopolitical power an idea was being experimented with. Imposing liberal democracy through military force was a neoconservative political vision for the world. Afghanistan was a testing ground for US nation building and extremist neoconservative foreign policy. Other nations were to fall victim to America's rampage which included Iraq, Syria, Libya, and Somalia. Afghanistan had a unique situation seeing as it was the first to experience a new type of US military aggression. President Joseph Biden may not meet the indented deadline considering the situation has become more unstable. Past presidents have made promises of withdraw, but have vacillated. Afghanistan's internal challenges will spread across borders.
The war in Afghanistan has involved both NATO and US forces. Unlike Iraq, this was a multilateral military intervention. When the invasion commenced in 2001, opposition was to the conflict was not as potent. There was a lack of understanding about the country and the complexities in a wider geopolitical context. The Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan in 1979 to maintain the Marxist regime. Following this was a growing armed resistance. The mujahideen would fight the Soviet occupation with aid coming from Pakistan and the United States. America's intelligence apparatus armed the groups that could become the future terrorists. The Soviet withdraw in 1989 left a power void in Afghanistan's fractured society. The country was in a state of civil war. Al-Qaeda emerged around 1988. The country provided the organization a base of operations. The Taliban was both a movement and armed group that appeared around 1994. The most formidable adversary of the Taliban was the Northern Alliance. Ultimately, the Taliban would rule most the country by 1996. By the year 2000, the Taliban was close to controlling all of the country. Mohammed Omar the founder and leader of the Taliban was de facto head of state. Little is known about how much he contributed to Osama Bin Laden's activities. At the time, the Taliban was at the height of its power and Bin Laden was losing significance in the political Islamist movement. Attempts at starting building Islamic republics in Sudan, Algeria, and Saudi Arabia were not successful. The instability in Afghanistan allowed for Osama to move freely and try once more to build a movement that could depose the secular regimes of North Africa and the Middle East.
Tuesday, July 28, 2020
A General Introduction to Fascism
The origins of fascism were rooted in the ideas of philosopher Georges Sorel. The French philosopher's ideology would have a profound influence on the thought of Benito Mussolini. Sorel contributed to the concept of national syndicalism, which was a reactionary and authoritarian movement in France. Prior to this development syndicalism was a leftist movement with socialist objectives. The syndicalist wanted to have Marxists and anarchists collaborate in a unified revolutionary front. This attempt failed miserably causing many to become disillusioned. This was the point in the late 19th century in which syndicalism broke into factions, with the authoritarian section becoming more powerful. Charles Maurras of Action franciase would become a political collaborator with Sorel. These new groups in France were opposed to liberalism. pacifism, secularism, and the growing individualism in western society. The Sorelians and Action franciase formed an alliance in 1910. Both Sorel and Maurras believed that humanitarianism was degrading the quality of European civilization. France and the whole of the continent needed dramatic revival. Benito Mussolini who would become leader of the first fascist state read Sorel's works. What captivated him the most was the idea of national myth. The shift to the far-right came for Mussolini when World War I broke out. Italy he believed that the war was an opportunity to rise to greatness on the international stage. This caused criticism and condemnation form his fellow socialists who disagreed with his opinion on intervention. Expelled from the Italian Socialist Party Mussolini became a devoted nationalist. The national myth was in the view of Sorel a great story to energize the masses to embrace patriotism. Through the national myth values of a country can be officially established. The national myth Mussolini developed was that Italy was destined to establish a New Roman Empire. Adolf Hitler dreamed of establishing a Third Reich that would last 1000 years. The fascists thought of their people as unique with the right to rule and conquer the world.
Fascism sought to eliminate democracy, liberalism, and individualism. These ideas and political systems were a threat to the movement. It was not enough to liquidate opposition within their own borders. Conformist thought had to be imposed upon the whole world. Parliamentary democracy to fascist was an ineffective system. It was chaotic by nature and could not solve the problems efficiently. People do not rule themselves in the fascist convictions. They need a strong and determined leader to assert control. Dictatorship was needed to protect the state. Liberalism was viewed as decadent and selfish. The state should matter more than the rights of the individual. Pluralism only produced inaction and aided the spread of instability. The people as a collective in terms of thought and action are better off being directed by a leader not restrained in political power. Fascists articulated this as a cause for the greater good, but was designed to curtail civil rights and liberties. One leader has the majority of political power and one party dominates government. The Nazi Party dominated the courts, schools, churches, and all organizations in Germany. The Italian Fascist Party also worked on a similar model having complete control of the press and entertainment. The assault on liberalism also took a cultural tone. Fascists presented themselves as defenders of traditional values and liberals part of a degenerate culture. This attracted many non-fascist conservatives who were fearful of leftists coming to power through elections. Women's roles were to be strictly that of wife and mother. Reproducing as much children as possible was their national duty, for those children would become builders of the state. The family unit was to be part of the state mechanism. Fascism wanted to replace the individual with the idea of a "new man." The "new man" would be an person willing to sacrifice themselves for the fascist cause and create a stronger society. What would emerge from this process would be a totalitarian society in which life revolves around one political belief system . War with France and Great Britain was inevitable. If Britain had fallen, the United States would have been the next logical target of fascist aggression. Fascism could not have international competitors when advancing geopolitical objectives.
Racism and aggressive nationalism constituted a major part of fascist ideology. Hitler and Mussolini exalted their people above others, while vituperating groups considered inferior. Nazi Germany persecuted the European Jewish population resulting in the Holocaust. During Mussolini's regime more violence was inflicted in Libya to make it more Italian.Anti-semitism and Anti-African racism were part of the fascist ideology. Italy was in comparison less anti-Semitic , however enacted its race laws when forming a closer alliance with Germany in 1938. Much of the racism fascism espoused came from eugenics, pseudoscience, and traditional European colonial prejudice. Nazism promoted the myth that the Germans were a special people. The Aryan race was the greatest contributor to world civilization in Nazi ideology. The master race was destined to rule the world and dominate the inferior races. Racism extended beyond just skin color, there was an effort to make fascist nations culturally pure. German and Italian culture in the fascist belief system was seen as superior to other nationalities. Internationalism was also rejected, even though fascist movements emerged in various countries. Brazil, Chile, and South Africa had active fascist movements. The British Union of Fascists and the Silver Legion in the US were the most notable groups in the western democracies. Aggressive nationalism was connected to racism. A people that sees themselves as superior to others is more willing to dehumanize people who are different. Scapegoating and prejudice on a massive scale makes it easier to manipulate a population into acts of mass violence. Teaching youth to hate also ensured fascism could spread. The result was genocide and numerous atrocities during World War II. Gypsies, Slavs, and Afro-Germans became victims of the Nazi regime. Social Darwinist theory was then applied to other groups. The disabled, gay, or terminally ill became subject to persecution. Inequality, discrimination, and murder became justified because of the idea that certain people were genetically inferior. Fascism dehumanized various races, religions, and nationalities.
Populism was used to ensure political factionalism or protest was not possible. Fascist parties by saying they were with the people allowed them to manipulate public frustration. Public anger could be directed at their political opponents such as liberals and Marxists. Fascists sided with the upper class elite, even though they espoused grievances with elements of the capitalist system. German populism during this period evolved from reactionary theories of 19th century philosophy. The Volk concept was a reaction to the Enlightenment. This group of thinkers espoused nationalism , the superiority of German culture, and the need for unification in the 1800s. This group became more racist and extreme, breaking away from historicists. The Nazi adopted this far-right philosophical ideas. The German people these ideas expressed had a unique destiny. Adolf Hitler would constantly express that the Germans were destined for greatness. Benito Mussolini presented himself as a relatable figure and a friend of the common man. Fascist presented liberals as bourgeoisie elites that lacked the fortitude to confront economic and political challenges. Farmers, shopkeepers, and workers became more responsive to the fascist message due to populist articulation. The upper class elites favored this, because it directed outrage related to wealth inequality at another target. Presenting fascist as defenders of the people became useful propaganda, which their opponents could not neutralize. The hardships of the common person were not the elite that cause the depression rather the enemies of the fascist movement. The fascist movement by using populism as a political tool attempted to show that it was a real revolutionary movement. Such an assertion was spurious considering it still supported cultural traditionalism. Although Christianity was not compatible with fascist belief, it was useful in manipulating older conservatives. Using the language of rejuvenation of society attracted younger sections of the population. Without populism the fascist dictatorships could not have consolidated power.
Fascism was defeated with the collapse of the Axis powers. The original founders may be gone, but the dangerous ideas they developed still thrive. Neofascism remains active in certain parts of Europe. The fall of communism as a political force caused serious economic consequences in the former Soviet Union. Far-right extremist groups, anti-immigrant organizations, and neo-Nazis have emerged. Hate groups also pose a serious threat to democratic societies. These groups remain small, however support could be growing in a new wave of global xenophobia. Refugees fleeing conflict zones has induced fear making people more prone to accept more extremist leaders. Anxiety surrounding the global economy also adds to this political shift. The difference between the neofascist and the fascist of the 20th century is that the current pretends to like liberal democracy. Neofascist rarely state that they want to dismantle the system. Rather, a gradual replacement with an authoritarian model is the objective. Establishing a totalitarian government would be difficult in countries that have a long history of democracy. The Wiemar Republic was a new political experiment for Germany. The majority of Italy's history was rule by monarchy. The transition to constitutional monarchy was easier in comparison to other European states. It failed to deal with the repercussions of a devastating World War I intervention. Under political and economic pressure it could not resist fascist takeover. Economic instability, corruption, and poor leadership make democratic systems vulnerable to violent ideologies.The destruction unleashed has puzzled historians, sociologists, and psychologists. The fascist movement was a dark period in world history. Fascism legacy is one of death and ruin.